We know what’s coming and we are prepared.
⚡️🇵🇸 "Israel Defense", a prominent Israeli outlet in security and political affairs, states that Israel "must threaten Egypt", including facing the real possibility on attacking and opening a new front on Egypt.
The Military Magazine also accuses Egypt, Iran, Yemen, and Syria, of militarily and politically supporting "terrorists", stating that Egypt "clearly" allowed smuggling into the Gaza Strip and that has allowed Hamas to establish a massive stockpile of war material.
The magazine also clearly accused Egypt of violating the 1979 Camp David agreement.
The Israeli Military Magazine states the following violations on the side of Egypt.
1) Egypt constructed three military airports, while there are supposed to be none.
2) Egypt has over 100 tanks in Rafah, while none are allowed.
3) Egypt has established 6 military crossings over the Suez Canal, which is not allowed.
4) Egypt has more than 1 division that is beyond the 60 kilometers allowed by Camp David and subsequent Israeli allowances.
5) 3 Radar stations are in Sinai, which are not allowed by Camp David.
The Israel Defense Magazine states that Israel has also failed , tactically and strategically speaking, due to Israeli negotiations with armed forces and militant groups, and that a militaristic and warlike approach is required.
@themediterraneanman
Azerbaijan: This Turkish country has destroyed more Christian monuments than ISIS.
Based off satellite data, Azerbaijan erased 108 Armenian monasteries, churches and cemeteries - in just one region.
By comparison, ISIS destroyed dozens of churches.
How is this okay?
@NoAgendaLara
UPDATE: Outrage erupts as there has been a SURGE in Islamists ATTACKING and vandalizing Japanese shrines
Security footage shows people wearing HIJABS storming up and unleashing on the Soya Shrine in Hadano City
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
— Hypothetically, if the U.S. wanted to carry out a naval landing in Iran, they would do it somewhere outside the Persian Gulf, most likely Chabahar or somewhere else in the flat open coasts of Sistan-Balochistan Province.
That way, they don’t need to risk their ships entering the Persian Gulf under heavy anti-ship fire and incoming drones while trying to land their soldiers on a rugged coastline full of fortified positions and artillery emplacements.
In Chabahar, they could bring their ships close enough to the shore with relative safety, under heavy air cover. U.S. jets, drones, and attack helicopters would suppress any anti-ship batteries heavily, and create sufficiently safe conditions for the initial ‘landing’. One also cannot rule out the possibility of deploying U.S. airborne forces to secure key sites before an amphibious landing is attempted.
This might be coupled with increased Balochi terrorist activity across the Iranian rear lines, complicating logistics and the transfer of ...
