We know what’s coming and we are prepared.
⚠️ JUST IN – Iranian Foreign Minister Abdullahian wrote on X media:
"In response to the phone calls of German Foreign Minister Baerbock, British Foreign Minister Cameron and Australian Foreign Minister Wong while exchanging views on some bilateral issues, I emphasized that when the Zionist regime violates international law and the Vienna Conventions, It violates the immunity of diplomatic persons and places, and the Security Council is not able to issue a statement condemning the terrorist attack on the Iranian embassy in Damascus, legitimate defense with the aim of punishing the aggressor is a necessity.
In the following, I emphasized the need to declare a clear position from the three mentioned countries (🇬🇧🇩🇪🇦🇺) in condemning this terrorist crime of the Israeli regime.
I stated that Iran does not seek to expand the scope of the war, but the return of stable security in the sensitive region of West Asia is related to the containment of the warlike and unbalanced leaders of the Zionist regime and the permanent cessation of war crimes by this regime against Gaza and the West Bank."
🔗 H.Amirabdollahian
Meanwhile, keep updated
Subscribe to @WW3INFO ✅
Azerbaijan: This Turkish country has destroyed more Christian monuments than ISIS.
Based off satellite data, Azerbaijan erased 108 Armenian monasteries, churches and cemeteries - in just one region.
By comparison, ISIS destroyed dozens of churches.
How is this okay?
@NoAgendaLara
UPDATE: Outrage erupts as there has been a SURGE in Islamists ATTACKING and vandalizing Japanese shrines
Security footage shows people wearing HIJABS storming up and unleashing on the Soya Shrine in Hadano City
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
— Hypothetically, if the U.S. wanted to carry out a naval landing in Iran, they would do it somewhere outside the Persian Gulf, most likely Chabahar or somewhere else in the flat open coasts of Sistan-Balochistan Province.
That way, they don’t need to risk their ships entering the Persian Gulf under heavy anti-ship fire and incoming drones while trying to land their soldiers on a rugged coastline full of fortified positions and artillery emplacements.
In Chabahar, they could bring their ships close enough to the shore with relative safety, under heavy air cover. U.S. jets, drones, and attack helicopters would suppress any anti-ship batteries heavily, and create sufficiently safe conditions for the initial ‘landing’. One also cannot rule out the possibility of deploying U.S. airborne forces to secure key sites before an amphibious landing is attempted.
This might be coupled with increased Balochi terrorist activity across the Iranian rear lines, complicating logistics and the transfer of ...
