đ§đŽ What was the attempted coup in Bolivia about?
After army units began leaving the main square in the capital La Paz just a few hours after the attempted coup began, everyone can't stop asking: "What actually happened?"
While former president Evo Morales called on trade unions to bring people to the streets in support of democracy and the official government, acting president Luis Arce swore in new military leadership under General José Wilson Sånchez, who immediately ordered the military to leave the main square in La Paz.
They did so, without much resistance. The first to leave was the rebel General Suñiga himself. A few hours later, he was arrested. Two other commanders were also taken into custody: former Navy Commander Juan Arnes Salvador and Air Force General Marcelo Javier Segarra. Suñiga is currently charged with terrorism and armed rebellion.
Interestingly, Suñiga calmly awaited arrest, and also had the opportunity to tell journalists that President Arce himself asked him to organize the uprising, concerned about "the decline of his own popularity."
However, the "attempt" turned out to be, to put it mildly, rather poor. General Suñiga's right-wing rhetoric, voicing opposition talking points and planning to free certain political prisoners, was not dared to be supported by either the right-conservative political circles in Bolivia itself, or even Arce and Morales' foreign critics (for example, the leadership of Argentina). The White House didn't even give any coherent reaction, only calling for calm and restraint.
Now the Bolivian leadership is stating that the situation in the armed forces is "fully under control," but the public expects new arrests and - not surprisingly - a serious "purge" of the army ranks.
Western media comment on the situation cautiously - but try to highlight General Suñiga's point of view about growing discontent in the country against the backdrop of an economic downturn due to the central bank's depleted resources. In addition, theses are published about the existence of a rift between Arce and Morales, who plans to run for president in the 2025 elections.
In this regard, the following points of view on the events currently prevail:
âȘïž What happened was a staged event, the purpose of which is not a coup, but to create a split in the current Bolivian leadership. Now the opposition has a reason to endlessly pedal the issue of whether Arce ordered Suñiga to cordon off the Murillo square or not.
âȘïž The military leadership, represented by Suñiga and his partners, was misled about the support for their actions from the true organizers of the mutiny, who either did not intend to bring the matter to an end, or stopped the events for other reasons.
âȘïž Many see a connection between the incident and the recent visit of President Arce to Russia. There he discussed the lithium complex project being implemented in Bolivia by the company Uranium One, which is part of the Rosatom structure (the facility is planned to be put into operation in 2025). Arce also asked the Russian authorities to assist in ensuring the supply of liquid hydrocarbons, which Bolivia is in dire need of.
âïžIn the latter case, such actions affect the interests of the United Original msg
The village of Piddington has voted for independence from the United Kingdom and to become a self governing village in a landslide vote.
91% Voting Leave
This comes after news that over 3,000 illegal migrants are to be dumped in their village.
Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble
Many have asked my opinion on a possible Russia-NATO conflict.
This is going to annoy many people, and hopefully give them a reality check, but my opinion is very simple.
1. Russia had some valid strategic and ideological reasons for what it did in Ukraine, regardless of whether I condone the invasion or not. Was it successful? Arguably yes, arguably noâit depends on what you consider as the warâs key objectives. The war actually pushed two neutral countries into NATO and pulled Ukraine even further away from Russian influence.
2. Russia does not have any valid strategic reason to invade the Baltics or any other NATO territory. Any attack on the Baltics cannot be excused as âprotecting Russian culture & languageâ or fighting âNazismâ. If this does happen, itâll be a clear sign of expansionism, nothing more and nothing less. Russia is not a saintly country and I donât put it past them.
3. If Russia does miscalculate and invade NATO territory, it will backfire ...
đ Market News Digest
[Sept 22, 2026 EST]
đ„ Top Stories
âą Trump says US-Iran talks were âvery productiveâ â White House/mediators signal momentum on a deal; Hormuz reopening and sanctions relief remain central
âą Oil swings on Hormuz diplomacy, then settles lower â Brent/$94.59 WTI after ceasefire/deal hopes offset blockade and tanker-risk headlines
âą Trump UNGA speech: hard line on Iran, AI, Greenland â urged isolation of Iran, vowed no global AI controls, signed Greenland security deal
âą US stocks end mixed; Nasdaq hits fresh record â chip/AI names led, while banks lagged and rates stayed firm
✠Oil & Energy
âą Hormuz remains the key market risk â Iran alternates between reopening talk and threats; U.S.com/Gulf push de-escalation and alternative flow routes
âą Aramco, Libya, Iraq headlines support supply-watch â Aramco eyes gas reorg/listings; Libyan shutdown trims output; Iraq exports top 3 mln bpd
đ Markets & Macro
âą Fed speakers stay hawkish-ish â Collins/Barkin ...