We know what’s coming and we are prepared.
'Is Britain systemically racist against white people?'
'Tell grooming gang victims they have white privilege... We need to stop gaslighting the British people'
An interesting exchange with Suella Braverman, the former Home Secretary of the UK under the last conservative government
Conservative parties in the West exist primarily to stifle the emergence of nationalism
As the anti-White impetus of the left becomes more explicit and undeniable, we can expect conservatives to shift from pretending white people do not exist, to leaning in to a kind of "anti anti-whiteism", as Suella Braverman is here
A diverse society would of course be more stable and tolerable to the historic majority if it was not promoting hatred of that group, and if conservatives ignore it they risk becoming outflanked by populists who will "go there"
This should still be viewed as a kind of containment then, but it is nevertheless a positive development that the centre-right must acknowledge it to stay relevant.
Once discussion of the anti-white agenda becomes normal, it is easier to make a case for a more explicit nationalism, and when this happens, the establishment right cannot make a convincing case for the White erasure they support
⚖️ 🇺🇸 🏛 He Who Decides the Exception: Trump Should Disregard the Supreme Court’s National Guard Ruling
⬛️ Judicial overreach mustn’t be permitted to trample the public necessity.
🔶️ The Supreme Court has again reminded the country that, in the American system, the judiciary can halt executive action with the stroke of a pen—this time keeping in place a lower-court order blocking President Trump’s attempt to federalize and deploy National Guard forces to protect besieged immigration enforcement operations in and around Chicago.
🔶️ The point was that a republic cannot outsource its highest political judgments to a tribunal without hollowing out self-government. Put those threads together—Cicero’s salus populi, Aquinas’ equity, Locke’s prerogative, Hamilton’s executive energy, Jefferson’s coordinate construction, Jackson’s independence, Lincoln’s warning—and you get a tradition that modern progressives and libertarians alike often deny ...
This is no longer a red-versus-blue spectator sport or partisan cheerleading exercise. The macro reality is brutally apolitical. The United States is functionally bankrupt, as Ron Paul has warned for decades, and the evidence is now manifesting in collapsing purchasing power. The price of acquiring real money—gold and silver—has surged roughly 200% in just two years, a silent tax that represents systemic looting via monetary debasement. We are drifting toward a sovereign debt crisis unprecedented in the entire history of fiat currency regimes. Even conservative frameworks, like Jim Rickards’ back-of-the-napkin gold revaluation tied to balance-sheet realities, imply a potential trajectory toward $27,000 per ounce. You don’t need to be a “gold bug” to recognize risk management: allocating even 10% of depreciating Federal Reserve notes into real money is simple capital preservation. It’s not about upside speculation—it’s about avoiding total annihilation if real money ...
