We know what’s coming and we are prepared.
Liberalism means total war because liberalism is an identity based on a belief rather than say blood.
Ideas are geographically unbounded so "unfreedom anywhere threatens freedom anywhere". Thus liberalism must fight to extinction. Ironically "blood" identities aren't this way.
And it gets worse.
You can exterminate a people but you can't exterminate an idea. Illiberalism can always arise spontaneously. And because it's healthy, it surely will. So liberalism must be ever-vigilant. The barest whiff of "authoritarianism" sets off an allergic reaction.
So ironically, liberalism poses as tolerant but is totalizing to a degree unimaginable for a "blood and soil" worldview. The infidels must be —.
Every identity based on affirming a "truth" is this way.
Think about this, and you will understand history at a much deeper level.
Azerbaijan: This Turkish country has destroyed more Christian monuments than ISIS.
Based off satellite data, Azerbaijan erased 108 Armenian monasteries, churches and cemeteries - in just one region.
By comparison, ISIS destroyed dozens of churches.
How is this okay?
@NoAgendaLara
UPDATE: Outrage erupts as there has been a SURGE in Islamists ATTACKING and vandalizing Japanese shrines
Security footage shows people wearing HIJABS storming up and unleashing on the Soya Shrine in Hadano City
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
— Hypothetically, if the U.S. wanted to carry out a naval landing in Iran, they would do it somewhere outside the Persian Gulf, most likely Chabahar or somewhere else in the flat open coasts of Sistan-Balochistan Province.
That way, they don’t need to risk their ships entering the Persian Gulf under heavy anti-ship fire and incoming drones while trying to land their soldiers on a rugged coastline full of fortified positions and artillery emplacements.
In Chabahar, they could bring their ships close enough to the shore with relative safety, under heavy air cover. U.S. jets, drones, and attack helicopters would suppress any anti-ship batteries heavily, and create sufficiently safe conditions for the initial ‘landing’. One also cannot rule out the possibility of deploying U.S. airborne forces to secure key sites before an amphibious landing is attempted.
This might be coupled with increased Balochi terrorist activity across the Iranian rear lines, complicating logistics and the transfer of ...
