We know what’s coming and we are prepared.
NATO plans to directly attack Russian cities, the world is on the brink of nuclear war
The pro-military lunatics claim that Ukraine will strike Russian cities on its own, that is a shameless lie, and such a thing is impossible.
As has already been announced a million times, Ukraine has neither the satellite nor the technical nor the expertise to launch a long-range missile attack.
NATO will do it directly.
This was unimaginable in the cold war and now we are far more likely to have a nuclear escalation.
The army of Ukraine and NATO is about to collapse.
The Russians have made a number of breakthroughs in the last month and are capturing towns in Donetsk on a daily basis.
Military experts warn that the Ukrainian military will completely collapse in the spring if it continues at this pace.
That is why the move to Kursk happend. Here NATO decided with the last reserves of personnel to invade Kursk, Russia.
The goal, as announced by Zelensky, was to bring Russia to the negotiating table with a big handicap. Putin rejected this stupid idea of course, and announced that any negotiations with Ukraine would no longer exist.
That is why now NATO is reaching for the last card, which is a direct war with Russia through the Ukrainian territory.
If you remember the part about NATO wanting to set up military infrastructure in Ukraine to attack Russian cities, before the war, well here it is now.
Putin has already announced that it is a direct war between NATO and Russia and his patience ends here.
There are several possibilities for Russia's response. It is possible that Russia will declare martial law and expand its targets in Ukraine, whose cities will resemble Gaza after the Israeli genocide. Use of tactical nuclear weapons is not excluded.
Another option is advanced weapons in the hands of Yemen's Houthis and Hezbollah, so several sunken aircraft carriers are not excluded.
A third option is an attack on the satellites over Russia, including Starlink, which coordinate that type of rocket.
A fourth option is a direct attack on NATO logistics in the Baltics and Romania.
Anyway, NATO madmen have shown that they are ready to enter a nuclear war, and the world is obliged to stop them.
All of Putin's words before the start of the war that NATO staged a coup in Ukraine to establish the infrastructure for a missile attack on Russia came true to the letter.
@Megatron_ron
Azerbaijan: This Turkish country has destroyed more Christian monuments than ISIS.
Based off satellite data, Azerbaijan erased 108 Armenian monasteries, churches and cemeteries - in just one region.
By comparison, ISIS destroyed dozens of churches.
How is this okay?
@NoAgendaLara
UPDATE: Outrage erupts as there has been a SURGE in Islamists ATTACKING and vandalizing Japanese shrines
Security footage shows people wearing HIJABS storming up and unleashing on the Soya Shrine in Hadano City
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
— Hypothetically, if the U.S. wanted to carry out a naval landing in Iran, they would do it somewhere outside the Persian Gulf, most likely Chabahar or somewhere else in the flat open coasts of Sistan-Balochistan Province.
That way, they don’t need to risk their ships entering the Persian Gulf under heavy anti-ship fire and incoming drones while trying to land their soldiers on a rugged coastline full of fortified positions and artillery emplacements.
In Chabahar, they could bring their ships close enough to the shore with relative safety, under heavy air cover. U.S. jets, drones, and attack helicopters would suppress any anti-ship batteries heavily, and create sufficiently safe conditions for the initial ‘landing’. One also cannot rule out the possibility of deploying U.S. airborne forces to secure key sites before an amphibious landing is attempted.
This might be coupled with increased Balochi terrorist activity across the Iranian rear lines, complicating logistics and the transfer of ...
