We know what’s coming and we are prepared.
All:
I do not understand the Biden/Harris/Obama administration's recent decisions regarding Ukraine. Let's cross some red lines that put Europe in the crosshairs of disaster. First, they removed missile locks so that Ukraine can use them against interior Russia. I get that these are older systems, but we've been reluctant for a reason. Second, they actually decided to allow Ukraine to use anti-personnel mines. While these can be force multipliers, they leave a disastrous legacy worth avoiding with talks of winding this thing down.
Why? Why would they do these things?
As I've mentioned in earlier emails, the regime wants to bog DJT down with an unreconcilable crisis. They want to preemptively take away this diplomatic win by making it untenable for each side to backdown. Worse, they are willing to sacrifice Europe over it. They want to distract DJT from his domestic agenda. This shows how afraid they are of incoming reforms. Additionally, the apparent joy that's broken out among influencers scares them.
We need to understand, keep backing a bear into the corner, it will lash out. I still believe, the invasion of Ukraine was caused by JRB, et. al. in their declarations that a path to NATO membership existed. This was intentional. They knew who was on the other side of that threat and his concerns. They leaned into them and forced the issue. Putin would be dead today (and likely replaced with a hardliner) if he had backed down.
Is this as crass as maintaining access to and flow of $$$ from defense contractors and the military industrial complex? Or, is it the insidious approach to the utopian ideals of the Georgia Guidestones? My gut tells me its just crass money laundering and largess, but we have international "elites" focused on reducing global population. Then, there is that Deagel Report you can't find anymore.
Right now, I believe the Russia/Ukraine crisis is about to break containment. We are about to see a broader European war centered around the former Soviet republics and Germany. We may get some cyber attacks and sabotage in the US, I don't think Russia will directly engage us. However, China may take the opportunity to strike Taiwan.
Only positive I can come to is that Russia is unlikely to use a nuke as Jim Cramer stated, "Nuclear war is coming." Add that to the fact Russian nukes my not work anymore. Worse way for them to find out is to launch one. Best to maintain the illusion.
📝🇺🇸❌🇮🇷 - On the Brink: Showdown in the Middle East
Amid an escalating American buildup, it’s clear Witkoff’s list of demands is more of a request for surrender. Accepting the abolition of its nuclear program and limitations on its ballistic missile force would leave Iran powerless to defend itself in any future conflict, which is the entire point of asking for these “concessions”. This demarche is a poison pill meant to justify further action when Iran rightly refuses it or, should they be foolish enough to actually accept it, will make the job of Israel and the U.S. easier when they inevitably tear up any agreement to conduct strikes anyway. The goal here for Tel Aviv and Washington isn’t peace and anybody who thinks they actually care about protesters needs to get their head checked; they want a final showdown with Iran to remove it as an obstacle to themselves in the Middle East.
For those that don’t remember, in the lead up to the 12 Day War last year...
The Democrats got new talking points, but the question is why this sudden shift in direction that betrays a part of their lunatic base. Something really shifty is going on over there.
EDWARD DOWD
🇺🇸 White House: U.S. exits Hague tribunals and Venice Commission
The United States is withdrawing from two international criminal tribunals based in The Hague and from the Venice Commission, as part of a broader disengagement from 66 global organizations, according to a White House statement.
The U.S. will no longer participate in the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals, which prosecutes remaining cases from the former Yugoslavia and the Rwandan genocide. The move reflects a wider recalibration of American foreign policy under President Donald Trump, aimed at distancing the U.S. from bodies seen as undermining national sovereignty or offering limited return on investment.
This withdrawal underscores Washington’s shift away from multilateral judicial structures and toward a more unilateral, interest-driven approach in international affairs.
Follow @RESTinvestigate on Telegram | 𝕏
