PrepperNow
Politics • Culture • News • Preparedness
Prepping, Politics and Societal Decline!
We know what’s coming and we are prepared.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
February 11, 2025
Top Groups USAID

Dig on USAID #1 Vendor which is the World Bank Group

https://2012-2017.usaid.gov/results-and-data/budget-spending/top-40-vendors

Top 40 Vendors
USAIDworks with a diverse group of partners worldwide. Following is a list of the top 40 vendors, based on amounts obligated. (Data is current as of November, 2014.) Please visit ForeignAssistance.gov to view detailed transaction data.
Vendor Name FY 2014
1WORLD BANK GROUP2,051,451,215.97
2 WORLD FOOD PROGRAM 1,482,417,197.00
3 CHEMONICS 501,697,892.98
4 P F S C M 389,233,980.00
5 FHI 360 351,378,922.26
6 UNITED NATIONS CHILDREN'S FUND 299,704,499.00
7 JOHN SNOW, INCORPORATED 285,510,939.85
8 DAI WASHINGTON 262,402,692.38
9 MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH, INC. 245,683,554.43
10 JHPIEGO CORPORATION 219,477,936.09
11 ABT ASSOCIATES INC. 216,992,854.57
12 R T I INTERNATIONAL 207,619,327.94
13 CRS.ORG 206,369,402.89
14 MERCY CORPS 196,784,225.67
15 GAVI ALLIANCE 175,000,000.00
16 WHO / OMS 163,170,668.00
17 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MIGRATION 154,002,795.81
18 TETRA TECH ARD 153,503,372.25
19 ACDI/VOCA 142,284,590.00
20 INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES GROUP LTD. 137,736,270.09
21 P S I 132,499,067.65
22 SAVE THE CHILDREN 125,954,645.34
23 INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS 122,971,079.00
24 IRC AND PARTNERS 122,390,490.55
25 AECOM INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, INC. 118,032,255.18
26 UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CO., LLC 115,178,945.33
27 CREATIVE ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL, INC. 114,315,264.78
28 UNAIDS JOINT UNITED NATIONS PROGRAMME ON HIV/AIDS 112,010,452.00
29 INTERNATIONAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. 111,532,142.15
30 MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 105,097,266.17
31 JSI RESEARCH AND TRAINING INSTITUTE,INC. 103,892,523.00
32 JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, THE 100,116,921.00
33 CONSORTIUM FOR ELECTIONS & POLITICAL PROCESS STRENGTHENING 89,965,953.67
34 FHI DEVELOPMENT 360 LLC 84,598,113.07
35 PACT 81,389,064.08
36 WORLD VISION, INC. 81,288,667.44
37 GLOBAL COMMUNITIES 80,740,523.92
38 USAID Support to Power Transmission Expansion & Connectivity 76,700,000.00
39 WORLD FOOD PROGRAM 74,055,902.79
40 DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP 69,632,923.35

https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/22542038.html#q22542533

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
December 25, 2025
A Christmas Message from PrepperNow!
00:10:29
Anti Christian

Azerbaijan: This Turkish country has destroyed more Christian monuments than ISIS.

Based off satellite data, Azerbaijan erased 108 Armenian monasteries, churches and cemeteries - in just one region.

By comparison, ISIS destroyed dozens of churches.

How is this okay?

@NoAgendaLara

00:00:05
UPDATE: Outrage erupts as there has been a SURGE in Islamists ATTACKING and vandalizing Japanese shrines Security footage shows people wearing HIJABS storming up and unleashing on the Soya Shrine in Hadano City 🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork 📎 X  (Twitter)▪️Trut

UPDATE: Outrage erupts as there has been a SURGE in Islamists ATTACKING and vandalizing Japanese shrines

Security footage shows people wearing HIJABS storming up and unleashing on the Soya Shrine in Hadano City
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X  (Twitter)▪️Truth Social

00:00:34
Hypothetically

— Hypothetically, if the U.S. wanted to carry out a naval landing in Iran, they would do it somewhere outside the Persian Gulf, most likely Chabahar or somewhere else in the flat open coasts of Sistan-Balochistan Province.

That way, they don’t need to risk their ships entering the Persian Gulf under heavy anti-ship fire and incoming drones while trying to land their soldiers on a rugged coastline full of fortified positions and artillery emplacements.

In Chabahar, they could bring their ships close enough to the shore with relative safety, under heavy air cover. U.S. jets, drones, and attack helicopters would suppress any anti-ship batteries heavily, and create sufficiently safe conditions for the initial ‘landing’. One also cannot rule out the possibility of deploying U.S. airborne forces to secure key sites before an amphibious landing is attempted.

This might be coupled with increased Balochi terrorist activity across the Iranian rear lines, complicating logistics and the transfer of ...

Scourge

Huh

post photo preview
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals