Remember the time when Donald Trump was reportedly paid $500,000 to deliver a speech in Moscow? Oh, no—that was actually Bill Clinton.
Remember the occasion when Trump allegedly failed to disclose Russian donors to his foundation before serving as Secretary of State? Oh, no—that was, in fact, Hillary Clinton.
Remember the situation where Trump was said to be in a business partnership with the Russian government, and his company reportedly received $35 million from Russia? Oh, no—that was John Podesta.
Remember the event where Trump was claimed to have profited $145 million from shareholders of a uranium company that was sold to the Russians? Oh, no—that was Hillary Clinton.
Remember the moment when Donald Trump was alleged to have approved the sale of 20% of U.S. uranium to Russia? Oh, wait—that was, once again, Hillary Clinton.
Now it is clear that it was Hillary who colluded with Russia.
Subscribe to American Thinker
⚖️ 🇺🇸 🏛 He Who Decides the Exception: Trump Should Disregard the Supreme Court’s National Guard Ruling
⬛️ Judicial overreach mustn’t be permitted to trample the public necessity.
🔶️ The Supreme Court has again reminded the country that, in the American system, the judiciary can halt executive action with the stroke of a pen—this time keeping in place a lower-court order blocking President Trump’s attempt to federalize and deploy National Guard forces to protect besieged immigration enforcement operations in and around Chicago.
🔶️ The point was that a republic cannot outsource its highest political judgments to a tribunal without hollowing out self-government. Put those threads together—Cicero’s salus populi, Aquinas’ equity, Locke’s prerogative, Hamilton’s executive energy, Jefferson’s coordinate construction, Jackson’s independence, Lincoln’s warning—and you get a tradition that modern progressives and libertarians alike often deny ...
This is no longer a red-versus-blue spectator sport or partisan cheerleading exercise. The macro reality is brutally apolitical. The United States is functionally bankrupt, as Ron Paul has warned for decades, and the evidence is now manifesting in collapsing purchasing power. The price of acquiring real money—gold and silver—has surged roughly 200% in just two years, a silent tax that represents systemic looting via monetary debasement. We are drifting toward a sovereign debt crisis unprecedented in the entire history of fiat currency regimes. Even conservative frameworks, like Jim Rickards’ back-of-the-napkin gold revaluation tied to balance-sheet realities, imply a potential trajectory toward $27,000 per ounce. You don’t need to be a “gold bug” to recognize risk management: allocating even 10% of depreciating Federal Reserve notes into real money is simple capital preservation. It’s not about upside speculation—it’s about avoiding total annihilation if real money ...