JUST IN - NTSB recommends 68 bridges in U.S. be evaluated for risk of collapse — CBS
1.California: Richmond-San Rafael Bridge
2.California: Carquinez Bridge
3.California: Benicia-Martinez Bridge
4.California: Antioch Bridge
5.California: San Mateo-Hayward Bridge
6.California: Coronado Bridge
7.California: Golden Gate Bridge
8.Delaware: Summit Bridge
9.Delaware: Saint Georges Bridge
10.Delaware: Reedy Point Bridge
11.Florida: Sunshine Skyway Bridge
12.Florida: Napoleon Bonaparte Broward Bridge (Dames Point Bridge)
13.Georgia: Talmadge Bridge
14.Illinois: Chicago Skyway Calumet River Bridge
15.Louisiana: Huey P. Long Bridge
16.Louisiana: Greater New Orleans Bridge
17.Louisiana: Israel LaFleur Bridge
18.Louisiana: Crescent City Connection Bridge
19.Louisiana: Hale Boggs (Luling) Bridge
20.Louisiana: Horace Wilkinson Bridge
21.Louisiana: Gramercy (Veterans Memorial) Bridge
22.Louisiana: Sunshine Bridge
23.Maryland: William Preston Lane Jr. (Bay) Bridge (eastbound)
24.Maryland: William Preston Lane Jr. (Bay) Bridge (westbound)
25.Maryland: Chesapeake City Bridge
26.Massachusetts: Tobin Bridge (southbound upper)
27.Massachusetts: Tobin Bridge (northbound lower)
28.Massachusetts: Bourne Bridge
29.Massachusetts: Sagamore Bridge
30.Michigan: Mackinac Bridge
31.New Hampshire: Memorial Bridge
32.New Jersey: Commodore Barry Bridge
33.New Jersey: Vincent R. Casciano (Newark Bay) Bridge
34.New York: Verrazano Narrows Bridge (eastbound)
35.New York: Verrazano Narrows Bridge (westbound)
36.New York: Brooklyn Bridge
37.New York: Manhattan Bridge
38.New York: Williamsburg Bridge
39.New York: Newburgh-Beacon Bridge (eastbound)
40.New York: Newburgh-Beacon Bridge (westbound)
41.New York: Rip Van Winkle Bridge
42.New York: Ogdensburg-Prescott International Bridge
43.New York: George Washington Bridge
44.New York: Outerbridge Crossing Bridge
45.New York: Seaway International Bridge
46.New York: Thousand Islands Bridge
47.Ohio: CUY-00490-0010 (I-490) Bridge
48.Ohio: CUY-00002-1441 (Main Avenue) Bridge
49.Ohio: CUY-00006-1456 (Detroit Avenue) Bridge
50.Ohio: CUY-00010-1613 (Carnegie Avenue) Bridge
51.Ohio: LUC-01W02-0002 (Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial) Bridge
52.Ohio: LUC-00002-1862 (Anthony Wayne) Bridge
53.Oregon: Astoria-Megler Bridge
54.Oregon: St. Johns Bridge
55.Pennsylvania: Walt Whitman Bridge
56.Pennsylvania: Benjamin Franklin Bridge
57.Pennsylvania: Betsy Ross Bridge
58.Pennsylvania: Delaware River Turnpike Bridge
59.Rhode Island: Claiborne Pell Newport Bridge
60.Texas: Buffalo Bayou Toll Bridge
61.Texas: Sidney Sherman Bridge
62.Texas: Rainbow Bridge
63.Texas: Veterans Memorial Bridge
64.Texas: Hartman Bridge (eastbound)
65.Texas: Hartman Bridge (westbound)
66.Texas: GulfGate Bridge
67.Washington: Lewis and Clark Bridge
68.Wisconsin: Leo Frigo Bridge
@insiderpaper
Azerbaijan: This Turkish country has destroyed more Christian monuments than ISIS.
Based off satellite data, Azerbaijan erased 108 Armenian monasteries, churches and cemeteries - in just one region.
By comparison, ISIS destroyed dozens of churches.
How is this okay?
@NoAgendaLara
UPDATE: Outrage erupts as there has been a SURGE in Islamists ATTACKING and vandalizing Japanese shrines
Security footage shows people wearing HIJABS storming up and unleashing on the Soya Shrine in Hadano City
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
— Hypothetically, if the U.S. wanted to carry out a naval landing in Iran, they would do it somewhere outside the Persian Gulf, most likely Chabahar or somewhere else in the flat open coasts of Sistan-Balochistan Province.
That way, they don’t need to risk their ships entering the Persian Gulf under heavy anti-ship fire and incoming drones while trying to land their soldiers on a rugged coastline full of fortified positions and artillery emplacements.
In Chabahar, they could bring their ships close enough to the shore with relative safety, under heavy air cover. U.S. jets, drones, and attack helicopters would suppress any anti-ship batteries heavily, and create sufficiently safe conditions for the initial ‘landing’. One also cannot rule out the possibility of deploying U.S. airborne forces to secure key sites before an amphibious landing is attempted.
This might be coupled with increased Balochi terrorist activity across the Iranian rear lines, complicating logistics and the transfer of ...