We know what’s coming and we are prepared.
REPORT: A Meta whistleblower just blew the whistle on Mark Zuckerberg—accusing him of working “hand in glove” with the CCP to censor speech.
Sarah Wynn-Williams, who spent nearly seven years as Meta’s Director of Global Public Policy, dropped a series of bombshells during her Senate testimony.
First, she alleged that Meta built “custom-built censorship tools” for the CCP—and used them.
One of the most disturbing examples came in 2017, when Facebook removed a Chinese dissident living in the U.S. after pressure from Beijing.
And it wasn’t behind Zuckerberg’s back.
According to Wynn-Williams, he was all in. She said Zuckerberg was “personally invested” in building Meta’s ties with China. He even started learning Mandarin and “had weekly Mandarin sessions with employees.”
She didn’t hold back in her testimony, saying:
“The greatest trick Mark Zuckerberg ever pulled was wrapping the American flag around himself and calling himself a patriot and saying he didn’t offer services in China, while he spent the last decade building an $18 billion business there.”
Wynn-Williams also testified that Meta’s own engineers raised red flags about China’s potential access to American user data—but leadership shrugged it off.
“I saw Meta executives repeatedly undermine U.S. national security and betray American values,” she told lawmakers.
And it wasn’t just about censorship. She revealed Meta’s AI model, Llama, was used to help power DeepSeek, a Chinese AI company now competing with OpenAI.
Zuckerberg insists Meta doesn’t operate in China. But according to Wynn-Williams, Zuckerberg gave them a censorship machine and access to American data.
While he pretends to stand up for free speech, this testimony proves he can’t be trusted.
You know who can be trusted? Our partners at Above Phone.
Ready to break free from Big Tech’s surveillance grip? Above Phone is your way out.
Their privacy-first phones, tablets, and laptops are built to block spying, stop tracking, and give you full control over your tech. No ads. No data leaks.
No ties to Big Tech. Just real privacy, backed by secure hardware, powerful software, and your freedom. Visit abovephone.com/pulse to unlock exclusive Daily Pulse offers—plus get 10% off two or more devices through April 15.
Every order comes with a 30-day guarantee and a free support call. Take back your digital life.
Shop now at abovephone.com/pulse.
Follow us: t.me/TDailyPulse
I went in for my 6 month visit with my Dr. and we had a very interesting discussion today. They told me that if the Dr. you are seeing walks in with what looks like a cell phone and sets it down on the table next to you they are recording everything that is said in that visit to your chart for "Better patient care and safety" I asked them if this was being done and they said NO I won't do it calling it a HIPA and Dr. Patient privacy issue. They stated that when they asked what happens to this recording the powers that be stated that its erased after the visit at which point both of us went B.S. Supposedly the Dr. you are seeing is supposed to tell you up front that you are being recorded but everyone knows how that goes. If they do tell you and you do not consent then supposedly the Dr. can click the do not record button on your chart screen each time but there is no way for them to truly know that you are not actually being recorded. The Dr. that I saw is currently looking to ...
Tinfoil hat time.
Here is a theory of mine. We all know the govt lies or tells half truths regarding just about everything in this country.
What if these huge capital funds like Blackrock, Vanguard, and State Street are buying up tens of thousands of houses so the housing market does not collapse? What if those dying and leaving houses are much higher than we are told? If a massive influx of houses hit the market, the market would start to drop to the point that some places could lose a huge percentage of value of their homes.
We know that most Americans are leveraged to the gills through their houses. For instance, if the house was purchased for 500k and now its valued at 1 million, they would have taken out a loan on the equity to either buy vehicles, another car, or a vacation. If the market lower the valuation of those houses, the banks will then take a hit on the loans they backed. Plus, new homes would not need to be built and the construction industry would also take a hit....
