We know what’s coming and we are prepared.
REPORT: A Meta whistleblower just blew the whistle on Mark Zuckerberg—accusing him of working “hand in glove” with the CCP to censor speech.
Sarah Wynn-Williams, who spent nearly seven years as Meta’s Director of Global Public Policy, dropped a series of bombshells during her Senate testimony.
First, she alleged that Meta built “custom-built censorship tools” for the CCP—and used them.
One of the most disturbing examples came in 2017, when Facebook removed a Chinese dissident living in the U.S. after pressure from Beijing.
And it wasn’t behind Zuckerberg’s back.
According to Wynn-Williams, he was all in. She said Zuckerberg was “personally invested” in building Meta’s ties with China. He even started learning Mandarin and “had weekly Mandarin sessions with employees.”
She didn’t hold back in her testimony, saying:
“The greatest trick Mark Zuckerberg ever pulled was wrapping the American flag around himself and calling himself a patriot and saying he didn’t offer services in China, while he spent the last decade building an $18 billion business there.”
Wynn-Williams also testified that Meta’s own engineers raised red flags about China’s potential access to American user data—but leadership shrugged it off.
“I saw Meta executives repeatedly undermine U.S. national security and betray American values,” she told lawmakers.
And it wasn’t just about censorship. She revealed Meta’s AI model, Llama, was used to help power DeepSeek, a Chinese AI company now competing with OpenAI.
Zuckerberg insists Meta doesn’t operate in China. But according to Wynn-Williams, Zuckerberg gave them a censorship machine and access to American data.
While he pretends to stand up for free speech, this testimony proves he can’t be trusted.
You know who can be trusted? Our partners at Above Phone.
Ready to break free from Big Tech’s surveillance grip? Above Phone is your way out.
Their privacy-first phones, tablets, and laptops are built to block spying, stop tracking, and give you full control over your tech. No ads. No data leaks.
No ties to Big Tech. Just real privacy, backed by secure hardware, powerful software, and your freedom. Visit abovephone.com/pulse to unlock exclusive Daily Pulse offers—plus get 10% off two or more devices through April 15.
Every order comes with a 30-day guarantee and a free support call. Take back your digital life.
Shop now at abovephone.com/pulse.
Follow us: t.me/TDailyPulse
Azerbaijan: This Turkish country has destroyed more Christian monuments than ISIS.
Based off satellite data, Azerbaijan erased 108 Armenian monasteries, churches and cemeteries - in just one region.
By comparison, ISIS destroyed dozens of churches.
How is this okay?
@NoAgendaLara
UPDATE: Outrage erupts as there has been a SURGE in Islamists ATTACKING and vandalizing Japanese shrines
Security footage shows people wearing HIJABS storming up and unleashing on the Soya Shrine in Hadano City
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
— Hypothetically, if the U.S. wanted to carry out a naval landing in Iran, they would do it somewhere outside the Persian Gulf, most likely Chabahar or somewhere else in the flat open coasts of Sistan-Balochistan Province.
That way, they don’t need to risk their ships entering the Persian Gulf under heavy anti-ship fire and incoming drones while trying to land their soldiers on a rugged coastline full of fortified positions and artillery emplacements.
In Chabahar, they could bring their ships close enough to the shore with relative safety, under heavy air cover. U.S. jets, drones, and attack helicopters would suppress any anti-ship batteries heavily, and create sufficiently safe conditions for the initial ‘landing’. One also cannot rule out the possibility of deploying U.S. airborne forces to secure key sites before an amphibious landing is attempted.
This might be coupled with increased Balochi terrorist activity across the Iranian rear lines, complicating logistics and the transfer of ...
