Guess who is the biggest beneficiary of the U.S Farm Bill? Is it farmers??? NO.
It’s Walmart. Take a look:
“When people think of the U.S. Farm Bill, they usually picture money going to farmers. But the truth is, most of that money actually goes to food assistance programs like SNAP (the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program), which helps low-income families buy groceries.
Here’s where it gets interesting:
Walmart—the biggest grocery store chain in the country—gets a huge amount of that money.
Out of all the stores where people use SNAP, Walmart gets 25.8% of those dollars. Kroger gets 8.4%, and Albertsons gets 5.9%.
Now, look at the big picture:
The 2023 Farm Bill will cost $1.51 trillion over 10 years.
About 81% of that (or $1.223 trillion) goes to SNAP.
Walmart’s share—25.8% of $1.223 trillion—adds up to around $315.5 billion.
That means Walmart ends up with about 20% of the entire farm bill budget—even though it’s not a farm.
So even though the Farm Bill is supposed to support agriculture, the biggest single beneficiary is actually a giant retail company: Walmart.”
@NoAgendaLara
WEF co-chair and BlackRock CEO Larry Fink boasts that his firm's global reach grants him unparalleled influence over future world leaders—including Keir Starmer—"before they win".
For more content like this, subscribe to @RealWideAwakeMedia
Merch: https://wideawake.clothing
X | IG | Rumble
Zohran Mamdani’s intern Arzoo Malik is calling for a Holy War through Jihad and martyrdom:
“This is all jihad, this is all ibada, and this is all counted for by Allah.”
She shrugs off the consequences—doxing, arrest, suspension:
“How gangster are you?... How committed am I to this?... What am I willing to sacrifice for this noble cause?”
And she’s at peace with the fallout.
“If you get suspended, if you get doxed… it will never, ever be in vain.”
A picture from this week.
His "smart water purifier" wouldn't give him any water, because it depended on the Amazon "cloud" to work, and Amazon Web Services (AWS) crashed.
AIPAC is now apparently having their donors give money to candidates "directly" (through some shady backchannel), rather than through their own organization.
This allows them to avoid the stigma of being "AIPAC-funded."
"The site appears to be using Democracy Engine LLC as the vendor, meaning they may be able to skirt FEC requirements to 'earmark' the donation, but what's also clear is that donors are being sent this link from AIPAC driving donations without any transparency of that happening," Matthew Eadie reports.
🧃🔗
Canada: BC Supreme Court rules that homeowners in Richmond may not actually own their homes, because once upon a time a tribe lived there.
"The court has declared aboriginal title to your property which may compromise the status and validity of your ownership."
Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble