š¤š± Between empty promises of a billionaire and a social credit system. The āsecretā way your behaviour is ranked on X
What is Tweepcred? Itās a reputation system inherited from the days of Twitter, a social credit mechanism built into X, where every like, comment, retweet, or interaction feeds a hidden score. Post the wrong thing, and your reach is throttled, invisible to followers, blocked from the For You Page, and your voice is confined to a digital coffin. The worst part? X wonāt even tell us what weāre doing wrong.
Tweepcred was open-sourced two years ago as part of Elonās big push for ātransparency.ā The release confirmed what many suspected for over a decade: the system wasnāt neutral. It could be gamified, and it rewarded those who knew how to play it. Industry insiders and large organizations held a massive advantage over individuals, defeating the very purpose of the internet and the cultural revolution that once challenged mass media.
Content was no longer driven by ideas, but by reputation. Your feed was curated before you even had a chance to curate it yourself.
Think of Tweepcred as an illiterate bot tracking your every move, looking for typos, āwrongā speech, and behavior to silently upvote or downvote your posts in order to determine reach. It is a relic of algorithmic censorship from the 2010s and it prevents X from becoming a true global platform. The failure of the reputation system lies in the fact it suppresses the very people it was supposed to protect. Ordinary users pay the price for these safety measures, while scammers and bad-faith actors exploit the system and push the algorithm to its limits.
The problem with the algorithm is not just that it punishes behavior, it tries to predict it. Tweepcred decides which posts should be censored before they even go viral. This creates countless false positives that bury engaging and valuable accounts under a sea of predictable, advertiser-friendly content, often generated by AI slop farms. Content that could have sparked conversation, built communities, or influenced discourse is suppressed. The result is a sterile environment where only ācorporate safe speechā survives, while human creators who aim for originality, nuance, or nonconformity are punished and forced to move to other platforms.
Algorithmic censorship is a digital extension of preexisting societal control. It wasnāt born on the internet. In real life, you donāt have lines of code following you around, but you do have people, networks of influence, institutions, and gatekeepers who police culture according to their own interests. The algorithm formalizes that same behavior at scale. It is the same mechanism that turned traditional media into a toxic institution, a system where reputation, not truth, determines who gets to speak and who becomes forgotten.
After 2016, the state and its corporate satellites moved to reassert control over the digital world they had lost. āMisinformationā became the new moral panic. Under that banner, media networks, NGOs, and intelligence agencies began coordinating with platforms to rebuild the hierarchy of information that the internet had overthrown. Tech companies were pressured to enforce safety online, which sounded like public service but functioned as narrative enforcement. It was during this period that social media algorithms, including Tweepcred, were built to counter the memetic revolution.
Measures like Digital ID are designed to chip away at our leverage over virality, creating a legal framework where users can easily be punished for their social media activity. Limiting internet access for minors will not be about protecting them from Skibidi Toilet or porn. It will be about preventing the rise of another frog generation, people who refuse to look to traditional authorities for guidance. This age segregation gives the establishment a blank slate with each generation, making knowledge harder to pass down, while algorithms subtly force us to self-censor and erase the identity of frog culture.
It's easy to mock this guy, laugh at him, say it's always Gingers etc.
However why are we not asking why, as a society, young men are making life choices like this?
Same as anyone who chooses to go against our natural order with how they live.
Something has gone badly wrong.
āOregon is using satellites to hunt small farms.ā
Farmer Justin Rhodes says the state redefined āCAFOā so even 3 cows and a milking stand count as a factory farm.
Cease-and-desist letters. $100K āupgrades.ā Family farms shut down.
Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble
āThe fetal bovine serum is just disgusting, and itās in almost every viral vaccine. They harvest it by inserting a needle into the beating heart of a baby cow to extract its blood. Where is PETA when you need them? The FDA even admits they use ācow partsā because cows are large and have a lot to use.ā
@NoAgendaLara
šš Climate scientistsā controversial claim Gulf Stream could be near collapse ā predicting a new ice age
A key Atlantic current could be pushed to the brink of collapse within decades, supposedly ushering in a new ice age and dramatically raising sea levels, climate scientists have claimed in a controversial new study published in the journal Communications Earth & Environment.
Per the new findings, the at-risk current in question is the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation or AMOC, a āconveyor belt of the oceanā that funnels warm water toward the ocean surface ā from the tropics to the Northern Hemisphere.
This current, which includes the Gulf Stream that runs from the Gulf of Mexico to the US East Coast and across the Atlantic to Europe, helps maintain the mild climate of Europe, the UK, and the US East Coast.
The study stated that the source of this marine temperature regulator, the Greenland Ice sheet, is being thawed amid warming temperatures, causing ...