PrepperNow
Politics • Culture • News • Preparedness
Prepping, Politics and Societal Decline!
We know what’s coming and we are prepared.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Plenty?

🛢 JP Morgan: Oil Flash Note: The Illusion of Plenty

In this war-driven oil shock, inventories have become the market's primary balancing mechanism. Unlike a typical disruption where spare production capacity can be mobilized quickly, the location of the shock and the scale of the supply losses mean the immediate adjustment comes from barrels in storage. Inventories are acting as shock absorbers of the global oil system.

Of 8.4 billion barrels held in storage, 6.6 billion are onshore and 1.8 billion are offshore. Some of the offshore barrels are simply in transit from producers to customers, others — such as Russian or Iranian crude — effectively function as floating storage. By type, 5.2 billion are crude while 3.2 billion are refined products. Visibility varies wildly. OECD inventories are among the most transparent because member countries maintain strategic reserves, collect standardized data and publish timely statistics. Much of the world is less visible, particularly in developing countries. China is a notable exception where inventories are estimated to be around 1.3 billion barrels.

Finally it is important to distinguish between Strategic Petroleum Reserves — state-controlled emergency barrels — and commercial inventories which are privately held stocks used in normal course of trade and refining.

Even so, not every barrel can be withdrawn. Of the 8.4 billion barrels in storage, we believe that, realistically, only 0.8 billion barrels can be withdrawn without pushing the oil system into operational stress. As of April 23rd, roughly 280 million barrels have been consumed to cushion the impact of the 3rd Gulf War. On paper that suggests a comfortable buffer. In practice, the picture is more complicated. Floating storage can be tapped quickly but only a slice of onshore storage — around 580 million barrels — is readily accessible. The rest is effectively locked up in pipeline fills, minimum tank levels and other operational constraints.

This is why inventory floors matter. A market can hold millions of barrels and yet become fragile once working stocks fall too low. Like blood pressure in the human body, the issue is circulation. Pipelines lose flexibility, terminals cannot load efficiently, refiners struggle to secure the right grades on time and traders bid aggressively for the nearest supply. The system does not fail because oil disappears, it fails because the circulation network does not have enough working volume. Same principle applies to refined products.

In a prolonged disruption scenario, demand is rationed well before inventories approach critically low levels. In theory stocks can last much longer but only at the cost of reduced consumption, lower refinery runs and broader economic slowdown. As a result full drawdown of global oil inventories is unlikely.

Like an onion, oil inventory draws happen in layers. The sequence is determined by speed of access, economic cost, political willingness and logistical ease, not by who has the most barrels. The order is:

🔶 Oil-on-water and floating commercial stocks

🔶 Commercial onshore stocks

🔶 Strategic Petroleum Reserve

🔶 Demand destruction replaces inventory draws (the pivot)

🔶 Operational minimum stocks

OECD commercial stocks could fall to the operational minimum floor by September if the Strait of Hormuz is not reopened assuming demand destruction stabilizes at 5.5 mbd.

@CIG_telegram

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
December 25, 2025
A Christmas Message from PrepperNow!
00:10:29
Anti Christian

Azerbaijan: This Turkish country has destroyed more Christian monuments than ISIS.

Based off satellite data, Azerbaijan erased 108 Armenian monasteries, churches and cemeteries - in just one region.

By comparison, ISIS destroyed dozens of churches.

How is this okay?

@NoAgendaLara

00:00:05
UPDATE: Outrage erupts as there has been a SURGE in Islamists ATTACKING and vandalizing Japanese shrines Security footage shows people wearing HIJABS storming up and unleashing on the Soya Shrine in Hadano City 🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork 📎 X  (Twitter)▪️Trut

UPDATE: Outrage erupts as there has been a SURGE in Islamists ATTACKING and vandalizing Japanese shrines

Security footage shows people wearing HIJABS storming up and unleashing on the Soya Shrine in Hadano City
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X  (Twitter)▪️Truth Social

00:00:34
Hypothetically

— Hypothetically, if the U.S. wanted to carry out a naval landing in Iran, they would do it somewhere outside the Persian Gulf, most likely Chabahar or somewhere else in the flat open coasts of Sistan-Balochistan Province.

That way, they don’t need to risk their ships entering the Persian Gulf under heavy anti-ship fire and incoming drones while trying to land their soldiers on a rugged coastline full of fortified positions and artillery emplacements.

In Chabahar, they could bring their ships close enough to the shore with relative safety, under heavy air cover. U.S. jets, drones, and attack helicopters would suppress any anti-ship batteries heavily, and create sufficiently safe conditions for the initial ‘landing’. One also cannot rule out the possibility of deploying U.S. airborne forces to secure key sites before an amphibious landing is attempted.

This might be coupled with increased Balochi terrorist activity across the Iranian rear lines, complicating logistics and the transfer of ...

Scourge

Huh

post photo preview
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals