We know what’s coming and we are prepared.
🇺🇸☢️🇮🇷📝 The use of a nuclear weapon in Iran may not destroy the mountain, but it destroys an entire model of international relations.
As has been floated in recent days, Netanyahu has been working toward an operation with tactical nuclear missiles against Iran.
This would be different from using a bomb like the ones we saw in Japan, which were designed as strategic weapons to destroy entire cities.
Tactical warheads have a lower destructive yield, usually between 1 and 50 kilotons.
They are designed to eliminate specific military targets on the battlefield, bases, ports, or armored columns, without triggering an instantaneous global apocalypse.
Most of these tactical missiles are, in theory, meant to detonate in the air, hundreds of meters above their targets, avoiding ground contact and leaving radiation that dissipates within weeks in the affected area.
The problem is that the plan reported by Tucker Carlson would involve detonating the Pickaxe Mountain, as Donald Trump also once promised. That would be a radioactive catastrophe of a different order from an airburst hundreds of meters above a region, something that already strikes me as absurd enough.
All of this is terrifying, but the use of a tactical nuclear weapon would mean changing the paradigms on which international relations are built.
The use of tactical missiles and direct attacks against a regional power like Iran would redefine traditional concepts of state sovereignty, respect for borders, and, above all, the logic of global nuclear deterrence.
In international law and relations between states, territorial sovereignty is the fundamental pillar. A direct attack with tactical missiles would transform that dynamic and bring an end to traditional red lines.
It would demonstrate that possessing a robust conventional army or a vast territory no longer prevents invasion or direct bombardment by technologically superior forces.
This would consolidate the idea that states can violate the sovereignty of others on the basis of anticipated threats, a precedent we already live with, but one that would reach another level with nuclear weapons.
The most dangerous shift would occur in how countries view nuclear weapons. Historically, deterrence works on the premise that the cost of attacking a country is too high.
If Iran, a country on the threshold of nuclear development, is attacked in a conventional and tactical manner, the geopolitical message would first and foremost be one of encouragement to proliferate.
This scenario would turn the global board into a far more unpredictable environment, where fear and the rush to acquire weapons of mass destruction would replace diplomacy and economic containment.
🔗 Patricia MarinsI’m
🇺🇸 A group of students in Lubbock #TX have started punching, kicking, and beating the teachers.. in the middle of the school day. Students can be seen dragging white teachers by the hair. How is anyone supposed to learn in this environment? It's worth investigating.
Follow main channel -> LiveLeak
Follow private channel -> LiveLeak Private
💵 🇺🇸 🏬 Half of Americans’ Spending Goes to Housing and Food, Most in 15 Years
Food and housing — which includes rent, utilities and household furniture — were the only two major spending categories to post statistically significant increases last year, according to the BLS.
Housing remained the largest household expense, accounting for 33.9% of total expenditures. Excluding a jump in 2020 after Covid hit, that share was the highest since 2010.
The share of spending Americans dedicate to food, meanwhile, has been rising since 2020 and at 13% is now the highest since 2011. The dollar value of the food budget — up 4.6% to $10,633 in 2025 — outpaced the increase in total spending.
Americans spent $1,579 on meat, poultry, fish and eggs last year. That’s 11.7% more than in 2024 and twice as much as in 2010.
Those products accounted for about 24% of grocery spending in 2025, up from 19% in 2023. Over those two years, protein accounted for about 95% of the increase in ...
🇵🇱 Why Polish President Karol Nawrocki lost the battle for the Constitutional Court – the last authority still not controlled by the country’s prime minister, Donald Tusk.
Over the weekend, Poland ended a creeping coup d'état that the country's prime minister, Donald Tusk, with the support of globalists, launched immediately after returning to power in December 2023. The prime minister's puppets took control of the Constitutional Court (COP) of Poland, with which the government fought for several years. This was done in a demonstratively power format, with the public humiliation not only of the current President of the COP Bogdan Święczkowski, but also the President of Poland, Karol Nawrocki.
Events developed as follows. After lunch on Friday, October 30, Karol Nawrocki flew to Senegal to take part in the events for the preparation of the summer youth Olympic Games. At that time, the police special forces occupied the building of the Constitutional Court of Poland. As it is located on the ...
🇹🇷🇱🇾⚔️🇪🇬🇬🇷 Turkey's Alliance with Libya Pushes the Mediterranean Towards a Gas War
Turkey has made progress in promoting its vision for the geography of the Mediterranean Sea: the agreement between Turkey and various parts of Libya regarding the redistribution of the region and its gas-rich seabed has been finalized. However, too many parties claim rights to this seabed for Ankara to get away with it.
Greece and Egypt have signed their own agreement on the division of the maritime area – in response to the Turkish-Libyan agreement. Further consultations are underway to expand the zone eastward from Cyprus in favor of Cairo.
In addition, countries interested in starting the development of gas fields (Egypt, Cyprus, Greece, Israel, Italy, Jordan, and, paradoxically, Palestine) have created the Eastern Mediterranean Gas Forum (EMGF), which Turkey was deliberately not invited to join.
This has led to a partial diplomatic isolation of Ankara in the region, but ...
