We know what’s coming and we are prepared.
#BREAKING Israel is discussing the possibility of allowing the leaders of the Hamas, including its military wing, to freely leave the Gaza Strip in exchange for the release of all hostages, Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth reports.
“This would allow the war to end in a short time and at the same time declare that the stated goals of eliminating the group’s infrastructure in the enclave have been achieved.”
Yedioth Ahronoth notes that the physical liquidation of all Hamas personnel and infrastructure in the Gaza Strip as part of the current military campaign will take years, and most importantly, will lead to heavy losses.
————
Yedioth Ahronoth on the same report:
This is the Beirut 1982 model, when Yasser Arafat left for Tunis following Operation Peace of the Galilee and the occupation of Lebanon's capital by the IDF.
The issue came up in the media in recent weeks, and since then it has had time to progress. It was discussed in several senior and essential forums in Israel, in the presence of the Prime Minister. Netanyahu expressed great interest in it. He requested and will receive additional materials on the matter.
Hamas leaving the Strip will allow the establishment of another regime; Illustrate that it was defeated; create regional deterrence; It will not, apparently, require a creeping occupation, which will cost the lives of IDF soldiers and be expensive in time.
But the cracks in the proposal are wide. The problem, after all, is not the leadership. Thousands of activists must leave. The terror tunnels, the military production plants and the rockets must disappear.
Azerbaijan: This Turkish country has destroyed more Christian monuments than ISIS.
Based off satellite data, Azerbaijan erased 108 Armenian monasteries, churches and cemeteries - in just one region.
By comparison, ISIS destroyed dozens of churches.
How is this okay?
@NoAgendaLara
UPDATE: Outrage erupts as there has been a SURGE in Islamists ATTACKING and vandalizing Japanese shrines
Security footage shows people wearing HIJABS storming up and unleashing on the Soya Shrine in Hadano City
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
— Hypothetically, if the U.S. wanted to carry out a naval landing in Iran, they would do it somewhere outside the Persian Gulf, most likely Chabahar or somewhere else in the flat open coasts of Sistan-Balochistan Province.
That way, they don’t need to risk their ships entering the Persian Gulf under heavy anti-ship fire and incoming drones while trying to land their soldiers on a rugged coastline full of fortified positions and artillery emplacements.
In Chabahar, they could bring their ships close enough to the shore with relative safety, under heavy air cover. U.S. jets, drones, and attack helicopters would suppress any anti-ship batteries heavily, and create sufficiently safe conditions for the initial ‘landing’. One also cannot rule out the possibility of deploying U.S. airborne forces to secure key sites before an amphibious landing is attempted.
This might be coupled with increased Balochi terrorist activity across the Iranian rear lines, complicating logistics and the transfer of ...
