Why would the USA bomb Iran?
Yesterday, Gen. Anthony Cotton, head of U.S. Strategic Command, told the Senate that Tehran reduced 'breakout time' period needed to enrich enough uranium for one bomb, from 10-15 days to 'presumably less than one week'
In late June of '24, according to the IAEA, Iran began placing 135 new centrifuges online. The IAEA concluded that once complete, Iran could build several nuclear weapons in less than 1 month.
In Feb of '25, the IAEA published a new report detailing two locations where the presence of anthropogenic (human-altered) uranium was detected. Iran had not disclosed to the IAEA those two locations, and has unaccounted for uranium. This would mean Iran is not in compliance with the NPT.
All of those combined with their threats to attack Israel and the United States make a pretty strong case for bombing them back to the stone age.
British man attacked for entering a ‘no-go zone’ in London.
A horde of Islamists surrounded him and questioned why he was in ‘their’ neighborhood.
They threatened him and began chanting ‘Allahu Akbar’ as they kicked him out.
A 65-year-old couple retiring in 2025 with average earnings will receive an estimated $1.34 million in lifetime benefits, while contributing only $720,000 in today’s dollars.
That shortfall—more than $600,000 per couple—is being made up by younger workers.
“Most of the growth in spending has gone to retirement and healthcare, while programs that promote upward mobility... have been left behind”
https://www.newsweek.com/social-security-medicare-young-workers-cost-10477619