We know what’s coming and we are prepared.
The contrast between these two groups is not accidental but fits into a long tradition of subversive tactics. The United States itself, through the CIA and other channels, has run coups, color revolutions, and destabilization campaigns abroad by exploiting divisions and polarizing societies. Today, similar strategies are at work domestically. The “beards and glasses” demographic (men with jobs, families, and responsibilities) are not weaponized, they value merit and stability, which restrains them from reckless action. In contrast, the “blue-haired nose ringers” are fed a steady diet of grievance and victimhood rhetoric online, priming them over the past two decades to be easily provoked into kinetic activity. The dynamic is deliberate: one group anchored in responsibility, the other conditioned for agitation.
Azerbaijan: This Turkish country has destroyed more Christian monuments than ISIS.
Based off satellite data, Azerbaijan erased 108 Armenian monasteries, churches and cemeteries - in just one region.
By comparison, ISIS destroyed dozens of churches.
How is this okay?
@NoAgendaLara
UPDATE: Outrage erupts as there has been a SURGE in Islamists ATTACKING and vandalizing Japanese shrines
Security footage shows people wearing HIJABS storming up and unleashing on the Soya Shrine in Hadano City
🇺🇸Join👉 @SGTnewsNetwork
📎 X (Twitter)▪️Truth Social
— Hypothetically, if the U.S. wanted to carry out a naval landing in Iran, they would do it somewhere outside the Persian Gulf, most likely Chabahar or somewhere else in the flat open coasts of Sistan-Balochistan Province.
That way, they don’t need to risk their ships entering the Persian Gulf under heavy anti-ship fire and incoming drones while trying to land their soldiers on a rugged coastline full of fortified positions and artillery emplacements.
In Chabahar, they could bring their ships close enough to the shore with relative safety, under heavy air cover. U.S. jets, drones, and attack helicopters would suppress any anti-ship batteries heavily, and create sufficiently safe conditions for the initial ‘landing’. One also cannot rule out the possibility of deploying U.S. airborne forces to secure key sites before an amphibious landing is attempted.
This might be coupled with increased Balochi terrorist activity across the Iranian rear lines, complicating logistics and the transfer of ...
