We know what’s coming and we are prepared.
From the reports I continue to receive via Iranian channels, one conclusion is unmistakable: the ayatollahs are not impressed by the American military buildup. They read it as posture - not intent. In their assessment, Washington remains deeply reluctant to convert capability into decisive action.
By contrast, what truly shapes their operational preparations is the prospect of an Israeli strike. That scenario is taken far more seriously in Tehran - and it is driving decisions on the ground.
The events of June 2025 cemented this mindset. When the United States appears fully engaged in diplomacy, Iranian officials increasingly interpret it not as de-escalation - but as potential strategic cover.
On the night of June 12, 2025, President Trump posted on X:
“We remain committed to a diplomatic resolution of Iran’s nuclear issue. The entire government has been instructed to negotiate with Iran. They can be a great country, but first they must completely abandon any hope of acquiring nuclear weapons.”
Yet just two and a half hours later, multiple explosions rocked Tehran. Soon after, the Israeli Air Force entered Iranian airspace.
Tehran has not forgotten that sequence. It fundamentally informs how the regime is interpreting the current moment.
5.16-6.2 million Indians live in the United States. A larger population than that of 14 of India's own states and territories.
$38 billion in remittances flowed to India from the US in 2025.
Meanwhile, American tech grads struggle to find work while companies import more H1Bs.
@huwhitepapers
🔗 Read more on the replacement impact of high-skilled immigration here
🔗 Support us at our website here
🔗 Follow us on X
Switzerland has reportedly rejected Palantir after a national security evaluation found the platform incompatible with Swiss data protection standards.
Military analysts determined that Palantir’s architecture cannot guarantee containment of sensitive information. The limitation is technical, not operational.
The review also warned that data processed through Palantir could fall under US legal authority, stripping Switzerland of control over its own intelligence.
Documents show years of targeted lobbying from Palantir leadership, including direct meetings with senior Swiss officials. The technical assessment overrode all political pressure.
The government concluded that Palantir would undermine data sovereignty, create long-term dependency on external specialists, and expose national systems to unacceptable vulnerabilities.
Follow @zeeemedia
Website | X | Instagram | Rumble
