— 🇺🇸/🇮🇷 The upcoming Iran-U.S. deal, what details will I be looking for?

1. Lebanon & Iran’s Frozen Assets

The primary issue between both sides in the past few weeks has consisted of two things:
1. A ceasefire in Lebanon
2. A partial release of Iran’s frozen assets up front.

If these two terms are included in the agreement, the U.S. would have compromised on them—if not, then Iran has compromised on them.

It also depends on the specifics of these terms. For example, will it be a true ceasefire in Lebanon—or will Israel be allowed to carry out limited strikes like in 2024-2025? Will Iran’s money be released immediately and unconditionally, or will it be released upon Iran’s agreement to certain other things? Will Iran be allowed to use the money in any way it wishes, or will it be limited to ‘humanitarian purposes’? These things all matter.

2. Management of the Strait of Hormuz

According to Iran’s SNSC, and per instruction of Iran’s Supreme Leader, the Strait of Hormuz must come under ‘new management’ in case of its reopening.

This ‘management’ consists of two main important parts:
1. Recognizing Iranian sovereignty over the waterway by using Iran’s designated maritime separation scheme and coordinating with the Persian Gulf Strait Authority (PGSA) before crossing.
2. The collection of transit tolls or another type of fee.

For Iran, it is mostly important that the collection of tolls is mentioned in the MoU, as it will be a huge source of revenue. Without tolls, there is no real benefit in controlling the Strait of Hormuz other than it being a matter of national pride.

3. Reopening of the Strait of Hormuz & Lifting the U.S. Naval Blockade

Reopening the Strait and lifting the U.S. blockade are two matters that are separate from the issue of management.

For this part of the agreement to be beneficial to Iran, the U.S. should lift the blockade first, and then Iran opens the Strait of Hormuz (under its own management). At the very least, the two actions happen simultaneously. If the lifting of the U.S. blockade only happens afterward, or is conditional on certain Iranian steps to be taken, that would be very problematic.

4. Nuclear Matters

While nuclear matters won’t be settled in the MoU, Iran has reportedly agreed to ‘commit to discussing’ it eventually, and if that happens there are three main issues:

1. The fate of enrichment: Will Iran be allowed to enrich at low levels like 3.67% for its own fuel production? Or will there be a temporary enrichment ban?
2. The fate of the stockpile: Will it be transferred abroad or diluted domestically?
3. The fate of the nuclear sites: Will the U.S. demand the full dismantlement of these facilities?

For a deal to be positive to Iran, the minimum is for the uranium stockpile to remain inside Iran and to be gradually diluted in stages, in accordance with commitments kept by the Americans.
A small temporary enrichment suspension would be a loss of face for Iran in terms of national pride, but realistically it’s difficult to restart enrichment within the next few years anyway. As long as the suspension is short (3-5 years), then Iran has gotten a good deal on that aspect.

5. Sanctions Relief & Economic Support for Reconstruction

Perhaps most importantly for Iran, it matters what the MoU says about sanctions relief.
For Iran, there are four main important points:

1. Waivers on the sale of oil, which should happen immediately upon signing of the agreement.
2. All other U.S. economic sanctions, which should be lifted as part of Iran’s compromises on the nuclear program.
3. UN sanctions, which should also be lifted as part of Iran’s compromises on the nuclear program.
4. An economic reconstruction fund (reparations).

Points 1, 2 and 3 are very important and should be explicitly mentioned in the MoU. For point 4, it’s important that Iran gets to decide how to use this money (reportedly $300 Billion) and the U.S. doesn’t intervene with it.

@Middle_East_Spectator