🇮🇷❌🇺🇸 - Are U.S. ground troops being prepared for operations against #Iran? – An Iranian assessment
🔹 Recent flight tracking data shows a number of U.S. passenger and cargo aircraft moving from bases such as Eglin Air Force Base, Fort Bliss, and Fort Liberty toward Camp Lemonnier in Djibouti. These bases are associated with special forces, airborne units, and combat aviation, which has drawn attention in Iranian analytical circles.
🔹 In parallel, earlier reports about the cancellation of a training exercise by the 82nd Airborne Division are interpreted as a possible indicator that certain rapid deployment units may have been placed on standby for operations in the region.
🔹 At the same time, the movement of amphibious forces – particularly the Boxer and Tripoli groups – has reinforced speculation that a sizable number of U.S. Marines could now be positioned in or near the battlefield, although the exact composition of these forces remains unclear.
🔹 Within this context, Iranian assessments do not dismiss the possibility of ground operations. However, some of them push back against the widely discussed scenario of a U.S. move on Kharg Island.
🔹 In this view, a ground operation targeting Kharg would be both highly complex and of limited strategic value, especially given the island’s proximity to the Iranian mainland and the fact that it can be targeted through airpower without the need for ground forces.
🔹 Instead, the assessment goes on to argue that, if a ground component is being prepared, it would most likely be directed at Iran’s southern mainland, specifically military bases along the Persian Gulf coast.
🔹 The logic here is that the current air campaign has already focused heavily on degrading Iran’s maritime and coastal capabilities, particularly those linked to operations in the Strait of Hormuz. However, from this perspective, airstrikes alone may not be sufficient to fully neutralize these capabilities.
🔹 As a result, any limited ground or special operations would likely be seen as a continuation of this same effort, i.e., targeting, degrading, or potentially seizing key coastal nodes that support Iran’s ability to disrupt maritime traffic.
🔹 In this reading, Kharg Island is therefore not the main objective, but rather a secondary or even distracting point in public discussions, while the real focus lies on the southern shores of Iran.
🔹 At the same time, the buildup in Djibouti is interpreted as pointing to a second operational axis, likely related to Yemen.
🔹 The objective there would be to preempt or contain the Houthis and prevent the opening of another front in the Bab al-Mandab and the Red Sea, which could otherwise amplify pressure on global maritime routes.
🔹 Overall, this analysis suggests that U.S. movements are not necessarily about a large-scale invasion, but about preparing for more limited, targeted operations across two key fronts: Iran’s southern coastline and the Yemen/Red Sea region.
🔗 Hamidreza Azizi
📝 Matthew Petti -
Iranians think all the talk about Kharg Island is a diversion and the U.S. buildup may really be for a ground operation on the coast of Hormuz and/or Yemen.
@CIG_telegram
Pedophile elites wanted to buy an Island, asked if it "comes with children".
Agent replied, the Island "does have a small school"
They don't know camera was rolling
Subscribe, lots of important information ahead: @Banned_Truth
Recommended Channels: Click here
🇺🇸 #Oklahoma high school principal (Kirk Moore) seen charging at and disarming a school shooter.
The suspect, identified as 20-year-old Victor Hawkins, was a former student who said he wanted to shoot up the school “like the Columbine shooters did.” While taking down the shooter, Moore was shot in the leg. He is expected to recover.
When the Principal woke up that day, he never thought he would be tackling a gunman.
Follow us -> LiveLeak
🇺🇸⚔️🇮🇷 Iran expects the U.S. to attack it soon — Fars News Agency
Deputy Inspector of the Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, Jafar Asadi: A renewed conflict between Iran and the United States is likely, and evidence has shown that the U.S. does not adhere to any agreements.
The actions and statements of U.S. officials are mostly media-driven, primarily aimed at preventing a surge in oil prices and secondly to escape the predicament they themselves have created.
The armed forces are fully prepared for any new American adventurism and recklessness.
Not only the armed forces and the people, but also political groups that sometimes had disagreements, have now come to understand the importance of maintaining unity.
🛢 JP Morgan: Oil Flash Note: The Illusion of Plenty
In this war-driven oil shock, inventories have become the market's primary balancing mechanism. Unlike a typical disruption where spare production capacity can be mobilized quickly, the location of the shock and the scale of the supply losses mean the immediate adjustment comes from barrels in storage. Inventories are acting as shock absorbers of the global oil system.
Of 8.4 billion barrels held in storage, 6.6 billion are onshore and 1.8 billion are offshore. Some of the offshore barrels are simply in transit from producers to customers, others — such as Russian or Iranian crude — effectively function as floating storage. By type, 5.2 billion are crude while 3.2 billion are refined products. Visibility varies wildly. OECD inventories are among the most transparent because member countries maintain strategic reserves, collect standardized data and publish timely statistics. Much of the world is less visible, particularly in developing countries. ...
🇺🇸🛢 The most visible oil inventories are about to plummet
Several things need to be noted first before looking at tanker data:
We are still offloading some of the tankers inbound laden with crude. These are temporarily keeping US crude imports elevated. The same VLCCs discharging crude turn into export volumes in 1-2 weeks.
We have an armada of empty VLCCs headed for the US, which will drain US commercial crude inventories dry.
All the while, we will continue to drain product inventories in the US. Petroleum product exports are expected to remain near all-time highs.
The snapshot above is our preliminary US crude storage estimate for next week, which includes 7.1 million bbls from the SPR. The final SPR release figure could be higher next Monday, so we will have finalized estimates out by then.
What’s not shown above is what happens to US commercial crude storage when 1) US refinery throughput ramps up to 16.8 to 17 million b/d and 2) US crude imports fall to 5.5 million b/d due ...